Grace Millman

As part of our hydrogen insight series, Regen is exploring in depth the role that hydrogen could play in a future net zero energy system. In this blog, Grace Millman considers the potential application of hydrogen to decarbonise the industrial sector, exploring the steel and cement industries in particular. 

As a new low carbon fuel source, hydrogen could be used across a broad range of applications to meet existing and future sources of energy demand. One such target area for hydrogen-based solutions is the industrial sector (including heavy industries in steel, cement, and chemicals) which is currently responsible for 15% of global carbon emissions[i] and 16% of UK emissions[ii].

Industrial sectors of particular interest for hydrogen-enabled decarbonisation include:

  • Industrial processes which currently use high carbon hydrogen (e.g., grey hydrogen) or ammonia as a chemical feedstock
  • Processes that rely on fossil fuels to reach extremely high temperatures (c. 10000C), or to produce an open flame.
  • Other industrial processes that are difficult to electrify.

Currently, the UK produces c. 27 TWh of hydrogen[iii]; almost all of which is grey hydrogen that is produced from the reformation of natural gas with significant carbon dioxide emissions as a by-product. Grey hydrogen is mainly used as a desulphurisation chemical in refining, for the production of ammonia and in some industrial processes. Replacing the existing use of grey hydrogen with low carbon hydrogen would be an obvious place to start and would have an immediate carbon reduction benefit. Low carbon hydrogen can also be used as a chemical feedstock, a combustible fuel, a reactant to remove impurities, and in the decarbonisation of industrial materials, such as steel, cement, and aluminium.

A big challenge for a new energy source is to match hydrogen demand and supply. Expanding the use of hydrogen in industrial clusters could be one route to grow the UK’s hydrogen market, encouraging industrial users[iv] to aggregate demand, enabling hydrogen production to scale up, and providing a catalyst for innovation and new end-use applications to develop. From these initial clusters, hydrogen suppFigure 1ly chains could then expand into other sectors and across a wider geography.

It has been estimated that, with the right industrial strategy, the combination of public policy push and market-oriented pull activities would enable wider-scale deployment that could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions from industry by over 30%[v].

The main UK industrial clusters identified for hydrogen have been centred around existing refining and petrochemical industries including Teesside, areas in the north west around Runcorn and Stanlow, Grangemouth, Foley, and in south Wales around Milford Haven, as seen in Figure 1. The proximity of these clusters to oil and gas infrastructure could lend itself to the production of blue hydrogen, manufactured via the reformation of natural gas methane and using former oil and gas wells to store the captured carbon. Blue hydrogen, however, faces a number of challenges including the need to significantly improve the efficiency of the carbon capture process, which is at present approximately 65% efficient[iii], and the cost of carbon storage. Blue hydrogen also maintains a dependency on natural gas which, with the depletion of gas fields in the Irish and North Sea, will increasingly rely on imports.

Alongside blue hydrogen, policy makers are considering the development of green hydrogen, produced via electrolysis and requiring low-cost electricity, as being the ultimate future aim as it produces zero carbon emissions. Green hydrogen could also be better integrated into a future net zero energy system, powered by very large-scale renewable electricity. It is significant that many oil and gas companies are actively developing offshore wind projects[vi], that could be combined with the production of green hydrogen for industrial sectors[vii].

Two examples of hydrogen as a decarbonisation option in industrial processes are explored below.Figure 2

Steel production

An example of hydrogen’s flexibility is its potential application in the production of steel. Using hydrogen in the production of steel has high decarbonisation potential, because hydrogen can be used as the source of heat and the reducing agent, which is normally achieved using coal. This is referred to as direct reduced iron (DRI) and does not require a furnace to melt the ore. Today, around 7% of steel is made using DRI, which makes steelmaking the fourth biggest global user of hydrogen[viii]. The existing demand within the steel industry could act as “low-hanging fruit” to decarbonisation via low-carbon hydrogen. Using blue hydrogen in the steel process could reduce emissions by approximately 50%[ix], with even greater reduction potential if green hydrogen is used. Thus, the impact could be both immediate and significant.

Scaling up hydrogen use in steel production would result in a 15-fold increase in hydrogen demand from the sector according to the IEA[viii], which would require significant investment and policy support. At current price levels, replacing coal with hydrogen would drive up the price of steel by about one third[x]. However, this gap will narrow in the coming years as carbon-emission pricing could penalise fossil fuel users, while access to low cost renewable electricity, efficiency gains from larger-scale hydrogen production, and optimisation of the hydrogen steel-making process will drive down the cost of this alternative. According to a report by consultancy firm McKinsey, “pure hydrogen-based steel production” in Europe will not become cost-competitive with traditional production until between 2030 and 2040[xi].

Cement production

In the UK, cement is the source for 1.5% of CO2 emissions[xii], and is very energy intensive due to the high temperatures required to produce it. In 2019, a feasibility study was undertaken by UK government into using a mix of hydrogen and biomass to manufacture cement. More recently, cement producer Hanson UK have been working with Swansea University to develop a new hydrogen demonstration unit in Port Talbot, South Wales. This would produce green hydrogen from renewable energy on site to replace some of the natural gas used in cement production.

Decarbonisation options for industry

Industry faces a real challenge in decarbonising, however there are a number of different fuels that could enable them to reduce their carbon emissions. Hydrogen, electricity, and biomass are all being considered as potential decarbonisation fuels. Each industrial application will have a preferred option which will be dependent on:

  • Fuel costs per kWh – gas is currently cheaper than electricity and hydrogen, however the price of green hydrogen is likely to decrease in the future as the capital cost of electrolysers falls[xiii].
  • Security of fuel supply – industrial clusters could establish a self-supply of hydrogen by installing an electrolyser on site.
  • Capital cost of plant conversion – this is likely to be higher for electrification.
  • Efficiency of equipment – this can counteract the cost of plant conversion. The efficiency of both electric and hydrogen-fuelled equipment is likely to improve in the future with further research and development.
  • The cost of carbon – the UK’s, post Brexit, Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) opened trading with carbon prices at £50 per tonne[xiv], which is a big jump from previous levels and is currently higher than in the EU ETS. Under the UK ETS, power plants and other high emitting industries will either trade carbon credits or pay a charge for every tonne of CO2 they emit beyond their initial allowance. At £50 per tonne, this would equate to a carbon cost of energy for natural gas of £9.25/MWh, and £16.09/MWh for coal. Significantly, allowances are expected to fall, while the cost of carbon is expected to increase to deliver the UK’s carbon budget commitments[xv]. Rising carbon costs should therefore encourage the industrial sector to reduce their carbon emissions and invest in low carbon technology.
  • Access to low-cost electricity – this will be key to the competitiveness of both electric and green hydrogen-based equipment.
  • Future government support – support and funding for research and development in both areas could significantly improve the options available for industrial decarbonisation. Some policy measures have already been outlined in the recent industrial decarbonisation strategy [xv], including using carbon pricing and establishing a policy framework that will ensure the uptake of fuel switching.

Some industries may want to decarbonise incrementally, slowly changing their processes to be zero carbon, while others would prefer to develop innovative processes that do not rely on fossil fuels. British industry is notoriously slow to invest in infrastructure. However, to meet demand and decarbonise, processes will need to be re-engineered rather than just modified, and the industrial sector will need the right support to enable this.

Biomass can generate zero-carbon heat, but biomass supplies are limited and are not best suited to use in direct heating. The potential for electrification of industrial processes could be significant, but it would entail an overhaul of existing equipment, which could be expensive. In many cases, the suitability of hydrogen, or equally the unsuitability of electricity, can be determined by the temperatures needed:

  • Up to a heat demand of approximately 400°C, electric alternatives to conventional equipment are already commercially available. Electric heat pumps for low- and medium- temperature heat demand and evaporation are already used in some industrial sites.
  • Electric furnaces for industrial heat demand up to approximately 1,000°C are technologically feasible but are not yet commercially available for many applications.
  • Approximately 30% of fuel consumption for energy is for processes that require very high temperatures (above 1,000°C), which include the production of steel, cement, and ceramics. There are various electrification technologies under development to electrify these processes, but these have not yet been proven.

A 2020 study found that 78% of European’s industry energy demand is already electrifiable using established technologiesii. However, some electrification technologies have still only been demonstrated at a pilot scale. If these can be developed, a large proportion of industry could be electrified, reducing the amount currently considered hard to decarbonise. According to Stephen Carr, lecturer at the University of South Wales, this leaves c. 15 TWh of industrial fossil fuel energy where hydrogen is the only suitable alternative[xvi]. This agrees with findings from the CCC, which found that out of 90 TWh of current fossil fuel consumption that could be switched to hydrogen by 2040, 15 TWh can only be decarbonized via hydrogen [iii]. According to the CCC, hydrogen could also be helpful in the decarbonisation of “more distributed sources of CO2 emissions (e.g., from the food and drinks sector)”, which they say would be impractical and costly to capture through CCUS.

Industrial processes need to embrace innovation and reinvent themselves to achieve decarbonisation, rather than try and adapt existing processes, which will allow them to take advantage of low carbon fuels. Hydrogen has a very important role in achieving full decarbonisation of the industrial sector, however using it as a widespread solution will result in delayed emission reductions and potentially increased costs. As with most applications of hydrogen, it should be used where it adds the most value and has the greatest decarbonisation potential. This includes in the steel and cement industries, and as a chemical feedstock.


This blog forms part of Regen’s hydrogen insight series.

We’ve previously written a paper looking at the development of the hydrogen value chain, we’ve discussed the opportunities and challenges for integrating hydrogen into the energy system in our latest podcast, and we’ve produced analysis of hydrogen production projects in Great Britain as part of our Distribution Future Energy Scenarios. In future blogs, we will be exploring the use of hydrogen in different applications, including as a low carbon maritime fuel, its role in the decarbonisation of heat, and its potential uses in the transport sector.


[i] IEA Energy Technology Perspectives, 2017

[ii] Carbon Brief, How the UK plans to cut industrial emissions by two-thirds, 2021

[iii] Committee on Climate Change, Hydrogen in a low-carbon economy, 2018

[iv] Areas with a number of industrial sites in close proximity

[v] Bloomberg New Energy Finance, ‘Hydrogen Economy’ offers promising path to decarbonisation, 2020

[vi] The Crown Estate, Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4, 2021  and Regen https://www.regen.co.uk/big-oil-raises-the-stakes-in-uk-offshore-wind-market/

[vii] Gasunie, Europe’s largest green hydrogen project starts in Groningen, 2020

[viii] IEA, The Future of Hydrogen, 2020

[ix] RMI, Hydrogen’s Decarbonisation Impact for Industry, 2020

[x] European Parliament, The potential of hydrogen for decarbonising steel production, 2020

[xi] McKinsey & Company, Plugging in: What electrification can do for industry, 2020

[xii] Hanson, Collaboration on green hydrogen research, 2021

[xiii] Currently around £800,000 to £1 million per MW capacity

[xiv] Reuters, Britain’s carbon market begins trading at higher prices than EU, 2021

[xv] HM Government, Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy, 2021

[xvi] Energypost, Which sectors need Hydrogen, which don’t: Transport, Heating, Electricity, Storage, Industry?, 2020

Stay informed

Sign up to the Regen newsletter to receive a monthly digest of our work to revolutionise the UK energy system, and industry insights.

We take care of your personal data. We will only contact you according to your preferences and will NEVER share or sell your details. See our privacy policy for more information
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.